Monday, May 28, 2012

B39. Missing Patches


I didn’t grow up with dogs.  Actually, until I met Patches, I was a little afraid of them, bitten once as a child and twice in recent years while running.  Mostly I just kept my distance, neither liking nor disliking.

But Patches changed all that.  Every time I went to visit, his barks welcomed me even before he greeted me excitedly at the door.  And when it was time for an outside break, he always lagged behind inside until I was ready to come along.  He valued a seat on the sofa beside me, even as he grew older and I’m sure jumping onto the sofa was not so easy.  The more I got to know Patches, the more I discerned his patience and wisdom and love and forgiveness. He seemed on a mission to patiently teach me his unconditional love, and soon he had stolen my heart.

When Patches left yesterday for new meadows where old dogs can run free, he left me a lasting gift.  Love.  For him.  For his brothers.  For all God’s furry creatures.  Maybe especially for collies, that will probably always remind me of him.  Thank you, Patches, for teaching me a little bit more about God’s unconditional love.  The part of my heart you stole is hurting a little today, but it will fill again with the wonderful gifts you have given me.


Wednesday, May 9, 2012

B38. Liberals Are Taking Our Country


Preacher says liberals are taking our country, and we need to be ever watching and alert.  Preacher says we are becoming a minority and must stand up for Jesus amidst a sea of persecution.  Blessed are we when we are persecuted for righteousness sake, he quotes to the situation.

Name-calling is nothing new.  We did it as children.  We do it as adults.  It puts us above other groups of human beings, even if only in our own minds.  If we call them a harsher name than they call us, we can feel like the victors.

Rarely, however, do the names we call each other really mean what we wrap inside them.  Let’s look together at this “liberal” word.

What the preacher means when he says “liberal”

When the preacher calls people liberals, he means “worldly” people who are without Jesus in their lives.  People who make ungodly choices and want to erase God and Christiainity from our culture.  People who are going to hell if they don't repent.

What does “liberal” really mean?

The word “liberal” comes from the Latin liber, meaning “free,” the same root from which we get the word “liberty." Interesting how two words from the same root can be interpreted so differently in our emotions, one appealing to our national pride and the other having evolved into a Christian slur.  Have you ever heard the preacher call someone a “liberal” and mean it kindly?

So who are the liberals?  Those so called are often very educated people, unfortunately another trait often degraded in our churches, even to the point of teaching that education is detrimental to our spiritual consciousness.  Interestingly though, have you noticed that whatever level of education a preacher has, whether a seminary degree or an 8th grade education, that is the most spiritual level, according to him, and anything above that is useless or harmful?

“Liberals” are often well-traveled people.  They have worked with and befriended people of different races, religious backgrounds, and ideologies, and often they have given up their prejudices and judgments of those who are different.  They generally believe that every human being has the right to live his/her life as s/he chooses so long as it doesn't impinge on someone else's rights.

And what about the “godless” accusation?  “Liberals” are both Christian and non-Christian.  For those who are Christian, what they have rejected is not Christianity but the particular brand of Christianity preached in many of our churches.  This brand is fundamentalism.

Fundamentalism was not born with Jesus.  Jesus was as unfundamentalist as they come.  Our particular brand of fundamentalism was born in the 1970s when there was an unprecedented wedding between Christianity and right-wing politics.  This movement was led by Jerry Falwell who started the Moral Majority, and other men like Adrian Rogers, James Dobson, and Pat Robertson.  These men turned the Christian culture into a political powerhouse, thus changing the very nature and focus of our so-called faith. This fundamentalism is characterized by a literal interpretation of the Bible and by anything Republican.

As an aside here, Billy Graham was never a part of this movement.  His Association, now led by his son Franklin, is very much entrenched in it and has recently used the evangelist’s good name to push some politics in which he would never have become involved during his days of leadership.  Billy Graham was the spiritual advisor to all the presidents of his day, without regard to political party, and in 1981 he actually made this powerful statement in an interview with Parade magazine:  “I don’t want to see religious bigotry in any form.  It would disturb me if there was a wedding between the religious fundamentalists and the political right.  The hard right has no interest in religion except to manipulate it.”  Perhaps it would surprise you that one of his ghost writers (celebrities rarely write their own books) was a gay man.  (If interested, read Stranger at the Gate by Mel White.)



A “liberal” Christian is likely to be more interested in reaching out to the poor and oppressed, feeding the hungry, fighting for rights where they see them being trampled, than in our traditional rituals.  Although there’s certainly a place for both, I offer the question of which one most resembles the life and ministry of Jesus.  Perhaps we should be less harsh?  Perhaps there's a place for us all?

Preacher also warns us about “feminists.”  We should avoid them.  Trouble-makers they are.  Worldly.  Can we examine that word too, before we move on?  What does the preacher mean when he says “feminists”?  He means women who do not adhere to the fundamentalist interpretation of women’s roles in the home and church.  A woman’s main purpose, according to fundamentalist understanding, is to support her husband.  Her role in life is centered on child-rearing and home-making.  At church she is a hard worker in multiple behind-the-scenes support roles, and she might teach other women or children, but she does not preach, serve as a deacon, or teach where men are present.

So, what are “feminists” really?  I suppose they are women (no, actually many are men) who dare to think that women have the God-given right to choose their own lives.  To marry or not to marry.  To have children or not to have children.  To be housewives or to be doctors, lawyers, professors, politicians, pastors, gardeners, soldiers, or welders.

Is our current Christian culture helping us share Jesus with those around us?  I don’t think so.  Do you?  What I see is that the Church’s hatred of “liberals,” “feminists,” and let’s not even talk about gay people, is driving them as far away from us as they can get.  And sadly, they might never see Jesus’ reflection in us at all, but Falwell’s instead, or Dobson’s, or maybe even Rush Limbaugh’s.

We have fallen away, my Christian friends, and we must find our way back, or else watch the younger generations, who have rejected our foolishness, find God on their own and develop their own churches which will not resemble ours at all.  Be assured though that God is not dead.  Be assured that God is speaking and working with the younger folks, the educated folks, the Democrats, yes, even the gay people . . . God is a God of open arms, open even to us who have strayed without meaning to stray.

If I am a liberal, if I am a feminist, if I am any other label anyone might want to pin on me, I wear it proudly, along with my Christian label.  Maybe the “liberal” Christians can claim the same Scripture of justification:  blessed are they who are persecuted for standing for Christ, even if the persecutors are other Christians.

The last prayer Jesus prayed was for our unity.  How did He know way back then that we would be fighting amongst ourselves about how to interact with the world and how to read the Scriptures?  Maybe he even knew we’d be calling each other names.  Was his prayer in vain?


Related posts:
God Did Not Write the Bible

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

B37. My Baby Birds

Friday, April 6 I went out to my screened in back deck to clear away the pollen for my family to come for Easter.  As I came out of the house I noticed that a bird flew from the corner above the outside doorway.  Seeing a pile of debris there, I had the fleeting thought that she might have been constructing a nest there, but I was focused on my work and soon forgot her.

The next day, Saturday, the same thing happened, and later that afternoon it crossed my mind again, and I went back out with a step ladder to see if there was a nest.  The angle was difficult, and the ceiling kept me from getting high enough to see far into the nest, but there was definitely a nest, beautifully and symmetrically constructed.  I went for my camera, thinking maybe I could blindly angle it and tell whether there might be any eggs.  Even the camera was awkward, because I couldn't see what I was taking and was just clicking and hoping, and I couldn't back the camera away enough to get a good focus.


But I got it!  3 deep blue robin's eggs!  No mistaking them!

The next day, Easter Sunday, my family had lunch on the deck, but after that I limited my visits to once a day, except for watching from the living room window.  The mama bird would fly to a nearby tree branch as soon as I came out, and then return soon after I went back inside.  Every day I climbed the ladder and peered inside to be sure there were still 3 eggs.

All that week and the following Monday the mama robin sat diligently, rarely leaving the nest and never for long.



On Friday, April 13 for the first time she allowed me to sit quietly on the deck a while before flying away, a privilege I got to keep for the next several nest days, as long as I didn't get too close.  Every day I visited less than 5 minutes, and checked the nest once.

I had been reading up on robin eggs, learning the incubation period for eggs was about 14 days and that generally one egg is laid per day, but I didn't know how long these eggs had been in the nest before I found them.

Tuesday morning, April 17, before leaving for work, I noted the mama bird was much more active at the nest than I had previously seen her, but I peeked out the door and saw and heard no sign of any baby birds, so I decided not to disturb her until I returned.

At 4:30 I sat on the deck watching her for about a minute.  Nothing seemed unusual.  Then she flew, giving me my opportunity to look into the nest.  With my limited view I could only make out one egg at first.  Then I saw something brown, and it moved.  I had a baby, or maybe two!  Only the camera would be able to tell me, hopefully!



Oh, how I wish I could focus, but there's no doubt!  Definitely a baby robin!

The next day, Wednesday, I didn't let myself disturb the mama bird until I got home about 5:30, and she really didn't want to leave the nest.  I felt bad getting so close to her, but my face was probably within 6 inches of the nest before she flew.  Just as I expected and hoped though, there were now two!  I won't get that close again.  If she is that protective I will respect that and give up my peeks.



Still no clear view, but oh so adorable!

Thurs. morning while the mama bird was away from the nest, I stepped out onto the deck, and both the mama and daddy birds flew in immediately to protect the nest.  After work I caught her away again and got a peek.  There was still one egg and two birds, one of which was moving slightly, but not opening for food as expected, and I couldn't see the other one well enough to know it's OK.  Please live, little birds! 

After reading a little more about newly hatched babies, my worries lessened.  It seems their inability to hold themselves up and their peeplessness (I made up that word!) are to be expected for the first few days.  What a relief!

Fri. morning, Apr. 20 I smiled as I watched breakfast time from the living room window.  The daddy bird was on the nest feeding the babies, and the mama bird was sitting on the ledge with a worm in her beak, awaiting her turn.  As the daddy flew from the nest, the mama bird hopped up to the nest and took her turn feeding.  After work I waited for her to leave the nest, and I went out for my daily check.  A 3-day-old baby, a 2-day-old baby, and still one unhatched egg.  The babies were still inactive, just snuggling together on the floor of the nest, but they are noticeably growing.


The next few days, lots of worms . . . but otherwise the two babies mostly just slept on the nest floor. Every day though they grew bigger and bigger and bigger.  By Sunday I had resigned myself to the probability that the third egg was not going to hatch, but the mama bird continued to sit, and both the mama and the daddy continued to bring worms constantly.  I watched mostly from the living room window and occasionally from outside.


Above: See the nest over the doorway.  Mama bird and daddy bird both worked steadily to provide lots of worm meals.


By Sunday, Apr. 22 look how big the babies are!  Still just lying down though, and I have yet to hear them chirp.  They are 5 and 4 days old, and you can see the third egg still in the nest.  Compare the bird and egg size in this photo with that of the previous photos.


From my usual living room watch spot, you can see the mama bird sitting on the ledge holding a huge worm that's heading for the nest.

Wed., Apr. 25: I'm getting concerned about my baby birds again.  They are 8 days and 7 days old today and still just lying on the floor of the nest.  There's been little movement the entire week, but they are definitely eating and growing.  They now take up the entire nest floor. They should be leaving the nest in one more week.

Thurs., Apr. 26: Ah, hope returns!  The two babies were much more active this afternoon, still without peeps, but stretching their necks, holding their beaks open, and moving around enough under the mama bird to make her sitting a bit wobbly!  The babies appear to be almost as large as the mama, although still lying down, it can't be well assessed, and they are now covered in downy feathers!



Sunday, April 29:  Ah, what beautiful little birds!  I should prepare myself for "empty nest syndrome" within the next couple of days!  Below: The two are peeking out. Then one shows off his/her feathers.



Tues., May 1: The past two days I have watched only from the living room and mostly crouched behind the sofa so I don't scare the babies.  I know their time to fly is near, and I don't want to scare them into jumping from the nest too soon.  The parent birds were more adamant than ever that I stay away - squawking at me, tweeting loud warnings to each other, and flapping their wings at me.  This evening one of the babies sat perched on the ledge (beside the nest) for hours, just looking around and occasionally spreading its wings.  I think tomorrow will be the day.

Wed., May 2: At 6:30 this morning the fluffy round baby was still on the ledge, pacing back and forth, raising its wings occasionally. 10 minutes later when I looked out, it had flown.  Not knowing whether this one was the first or the second, I cautiously went to the nest and found no little birds.  My brave little friends have set out on their own, leaving their nest empty except for their lingering feathers and the lone unhatched egg.  



A shadow of sadness hovers as I look upon the empty ledge, even that I can step out onto the deck without provoking parental squawks.  What joy these little birds have shared with me over the past month.  And yet, the joy lingers, both at the precious memories of such a special gift from God and at the knowledge that the little birds survived.  I will see their faces in every robin that ever hops around my yard, and each one will be more precious than ever before.  Now as I sit on my deck and as I take my daily walks, I will distinguish the cries of distress amidst the bird songs and smile in recognition of all the daddy birds standing watch on the ground over their little families that are hidden in the trees.  And I think for several days, as I walk through my living room, I will be checking the ledge, just in case someone should return for a visit. 


Saturday, April 14, 2012

B36. Sexual Orientation: It's Not a Sin

Europe, 16th century: When Copernicus discovered that the sun, not the earth, was the center of what we now know as our solar system, Scripture was used to condemn him. Luther quoted Joshua 10:13 and called Copernicus a "fool." Calvin quoted the 93rd Psalm and said, "Who will venture to place the authority of Copernicus above that of the Holy Spirit?" Melanchthon, the first systematic theologian of the Protestant Reformation, quoted Eccles. 1:4-5 and suggested that "severe measures be taken to silence" all those who agreed with Copernicus, in order to "preserve the truth as revealed by God." (Stranger at the Gate, Plume 1995, pp.239-240)

Baptist Church in Rochester, NY 1870’s: A deacon confronts the pastor for placing a piano in the church, describing it as a “sign of the beast.” This incident, recorded in Helen Barrett Montgomery's memoirs, was a sign of the times. Although we can only speculate, it has been suggested that this attitude stemmed from the fact that pianos were used in dance halls and saloons. Today there are still churches that claim all instruments EXCEPT the piano and organ are of Satan, but most churches today enjoy instrumental music as an integral part of worshiping God.
Eastern Europe, late 1930’s-1945: Even theologians participated fully in Hitler’s call to exterminate some 11 million human beings, including Jews, Mentally Handicapped Persons, Disabled Persons, Homosexual Men, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Catholic Poles, Soviet POW’s, Political Prisoners, and Romani People. Why? Presumably because Hitler convinced them that these were all sub-humans and were a threat to their well-being?? Today those of us who read the memoirs of Holocaust survivors, or visit the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC are muted in disbelief at the horror of such inhumane treatment. One man, who was then well respected and trusted, managed to convince an entire culture that all these groups of people were sub-human and were outside of God’s plan for the human race.
Before reading on, please pause here for a moment, and really think about this atrocity. How could so many supposedly well meaning people, including those who call themselves God’s people, buy into this ideology? Are we immune to such persuasion, especially if we repeatedly hear it from our trusted religious leaders?
Southern Baptist Convention, June 20, 1995: The SBC adopted a resolution in 1995 renouncing its racist roots and apologizing for its defense of slavery. Yes, 1995!
A 1968 survey conducted by the SBC’s Home Mission Board showed that only 11% of Southern Baptist churches would admit African-Americans. A century after the abolition of slavery. Think about that.

North Carolina Baptist State Convention, Nov. 14, 2006: Voted to throw out any church that advocated homosexuality in any way, even knowingly having a gay person in membership. Other denominations have made similar rulings. “Go away homosexuals! You are not welcome in our churches. You are an abomination. Oh, and we love you.”

I am a lifelong Christian, but have painfully come to realize that our religious structures have been throughout history and are still the greatest of all oppressors.  This is not reflective of Jesus' life and teachings, and we, you and I, can start to change what has gone wrong.  First, though we must identify the problem.
There are certain words that set certain Christians off. Words like abortion, evolution, women in ministry, President Obama, and the winner for this decade, homosexuality. We hear these words, and our brains and tongues go into automatic pilot. We don’t even hear the questions or the issues, just the word. We have rehearsed our responses and are proud to hone our speaking skills every chance we get. This will be a blog that will “ruffle the feathers” of most of you who read it, because its purpose is to challenge us to think deeper and to step beyond the comfortable boxes we have built around ourselves.

HOW CHRISTIANS REACT TO GAY PEOPLE
First of all, why is this issue so important to us as the Church? It is important because it is the daily struggle of so many people all around us every day. Hurting people, searching people, people created by the God who created us all, most of whom have turned their backs on the Church and God, because the Church has turned its back on them, and they don’t make the distinction between the perfect God and His fallible Church. You think you don’t know any gay people? You are blind to them probably because they perceive that you do not understand and would feel the need to share with them how abominable their lifestyle is to God (they have heard it already!), and whatever respect you have for them now would disappear. True, isn’t it? What if you found out your supervisor was gay? Your nephew? Your child’s teacher? Your music minister? Your brother? The guy in the next cubicle? Your daughter? Your husband?
Chances are you would want to protect those you love from them, and/or you would want to help the gay person change. This natural response is riddled with fallacy. First, gay people are no more likely to be predatory or child molesters than are heterosexual people. And second, gay people cannot choose to be straight, and we’ll return to this a little later. Gay people are all around us everyday living all kinds of lives, just like heterosexuals are.
Now, that said, I do think there is a tendency to more promiscuity within the gay male community, due I think to two reasons: 1) the church has shunned them, so they are not welcome to be a part of a fellowship that’s growing in Christian principles, and 2) men in general are more sexually driven, and without the constraints put on by God (and wife!), many men fall naturally into promiscuous lifestyles.
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY?
The one obstacle to many Christians accepting what science knows to be true is their personal interpretation of the Bible. There are those who have been taught that the Bible is God’s exact words given directly to us for the purpose of telling us how to live, and that every word in our KJV or NIV is without discrepancy and meant to be directly applied to our everyday lives. A large number of today’s churches teach such an interpretation.
Others, however, view each individual scriptural writing with regard to such questions as who wrote it, who was its intended audience, when was it written and why, etc. This is an extremely important point in understanding the issue of this blog, so if you truly desire to understand the viewpoint I am about to present, please pause for a moment and read this blog first, pertaining to Scriptural interpretation.
There is much written on the Biblical interpretation of the homosexual passages of the Bible. The literalists cling to such passages as Lev. 18:22 to say “case closed,” and they close it. Much has been written by Christians on both sides of this issue, and I would do it a disservice to attempt to cover the Biblical arguments in a couple of paragraphs.  I will say, however, that the word "homosexual" did not even exist in the languages from which the Bible was translated, so to even have the word in our English translations is fodder for hours of discussion.  For those on the “case closed” side, would you explain away the following Scripture passages? The words are in the Bible. Shall we apply them directly to our lives?
Gen. 6:2-4 Uncircumcised males have broken God’s covenant and should be cut off from God's people. (bad pun?)
Ex. 21:22 When a man hurts a pregnant woman and causes a miscarriage, “yet no harm follows,” (huh??), he shall be fined.
Ex. 31:14-15 Whoever does any work on the Sabbath shall be put to death. (!) (Num. 15:32-36 tells about a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath who is stoned to death at God’s command!)
Matt. 23:9 Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father who is in heaven.
Lev. 3:17, 11:6-7, 14:11ff Eat neither fat nor blood, hare nor swine, ostrich (I hope my favorite roast pork dish at Mambo Grill is exempted!)
Lev. 11:10 Eating water creatures that don’t have fins and scales is an abomination! (Shrimp, anyone?)
Lev. 15, 20:18 A menstruating woman is unclean, and also the man who has relations with her (cut off from people)
Lev. 19:19 Don’t let cattle mix-breed, don’t sow two different kinds of seed in one field (corn and beans?), don’t wear clothes made of two different materials (cotton and polyester?)
Lev. 19:27-28 Don’t round off your hair at the temples or mar the edges of your beard; no tattoos (uh-oh!)
Lev. 20:18; Deut. 21:18-20 A child who curses his parent shall be put to death (!); If you have a stubborn and rebellious son, turn him over to the elders to be stoned to death. (!)
Lev. 20:10 Adulterers shall both be put to death.  (This would thin out the population, wouldn't it!)
Lev. 24:17-20 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, fracture for fracture (opposite of Jesus’ teachings to turn the other cheek)
Lev. 25:39-46 Rules for owning slaves
Num. 5:2 All with a discharge and all who have been in contact with a dead body shall be put out of the camp.
Mark 10:2-12 Remarriage is adultery. (Who would be left if our churches rejected all remarried people?)
Mark 16:17-18 Jesus said the signs of those who believe will be: casting out demons, speaking in tongues, picking up serpents, drinking poison without being harmed, and healing the sick (Can we call ourselves “believers”?!)
1 Tim. 2:9-15 women, do not wear braids, gold, pearls, or costly apparel; don’t teach or have authority over men; you will be saved in child-bearing (huh?? Now that's a salvation plan we don't hear from the pulpit!)
Deut. 22:13-21 A woman found to be not virgin (by her husband’s testimony that her garment was not soiled), shall be stoned.
Deut. 23:1 A man with crushed testicles or a cut off penis cannot enter the assembly of the Lord. (I’m not making this stuff up!)
Deut. 23:2 Nor a bastard, even to the 10th generation of his descendants (10th generation?! This is plain ridiculous, and mean!  To my younger readers for whom bastard has changed meanings: A bastard is a child born to unmarried parents)
Mark 12:25 No marriage in heaven (not many sermons on that one!)
2 Kings 2:23-25 Elisha curses young boys for calling him “baldhead”, and wild bears tear 42 of them. (Again, not good sermon material!)
1 Cor. 7:14; 15:29 Paul says an unbelieving spouse is consecrated through the believing one (He also admits these are his own words.); then he defends baptism on behalf of the dead. (Two more plans of salvation we Protestants don't hear from the pulpit!)
1 Cor. 11:14 Long hair on a man is degrading.  (Did Jesus have long hair?)
OK, I’ll stop there. My point here is that literalism, applied directly to our 21st century lives, causes many problems. God is not confined to any time or culture, and God (not the law) continues to be just as relevant in our culture as in the OT times.  If we can evolve our understanding of the Bible, we can strengthen our relationship with God, Jesus Christ, and our neighbor.
CULTURAL ATTITUDES
Attitudes about homosexuality vary greatly from culture to culture and from century to century. There has likely never been a culture without homosexuals, even in the animal world, but in many cultures, it has been a non-issue, somewhat like left-handed people or people with red hair. Notably different from most, but an insignificant distinction. Many of the Native American cultures honor their homosexual members, referring to them as two-spirited people and honoring their special qualities and gifts. Other cultures, like some in the Middle East, have made homosexuality illegal and punishable by death. Others, like ours, have singled homosexuals out as morally reprehensible and socially deviant persons.
The culture of our age, including the Christian subculture, has an inflated fixation on sexuality in general and especially on homosexuality. I wholehearted affirm that our younger generations are living in a sexual culture that is harming them emotionally, mentally, and spiritually, as the lines of sexual morality are being erased. The free sex mentality, whether homosexual or heterosexual, grieves me as I see the emotional and spiritual confusion of my high school and college students. I sympathize with a generation that falls into such harmful choices amidst such a confusing culture, but in no way do I condone such sexual freedom. Sexual orientation, however, is not about cultural sexual behavior.

WHO ARE GAY PEOPLE?
Homosexuality has no boundaries. Gay people are born into families of every race, every culture, and every religion.  Gay people have apparently existed in every culture of every time period and are in every local church family, at least as children.  We lose them as adults though because they hear our condemnation and in confusion leave to escape it.  Gay people are businessmen, public servants, waitresses, parents, siblings, sons, and daughters. Gay people are as varied as their heterosexual counterparts.

Without attempting to stereotype, there are some typical qualities and gifts that gay people often bring to their worlds that are worthy of mention here. Gay men are often especially caring and sensitive to others’ needs, thus often choosing ministerial careers. It is the gay man who will often take in his aging parents to care for them. He is often gifted in the arts, musically talented, and attracted to careers in entertainment, theatre, fashion or design, or often to church music ministry. Gay women typically enjoy sports, many rising into the college and professional levels, or coaching, and are often driven in their careers, many making great contributions to their professions.

Sexual orientation is a misnomer. A person’s sexual orientation is not about sex. It is about identity. This unfortunate label is, in my opinion, a lot of the problem with our society’s inability to see gay persons as it sees everyone else. We cannot say “homosexual” without conjuring mental images of “what they do.” I call this the “ick” factor. It has to be wrong, because it’s “icky.” Why do we want to think about what ANYONE does sexually? Do you think about what your supervisor does with his wife? Do you think about what your parents do? (Now, THAT’S icky!) If the ick factor is a litmus test for right and wrong, it is definitely a sin for our parents to have sex, is it not? Not to mention our married daughters. Let’s not think about these things! Not about heterosexuals, not about homosexuals. I hope I live to see the day when our culture will stop calling gay people by “sexual” names and embrace the gifts our gay population brings to our lives.
The estimates of what percentage of the population is gay vary greatly, depending mainly on the “agenda” of the organization conducting the study. Studies conducted by those who see homosexuality as an atrocity, for example, tend to find far smaller percentages (1-2%) than studies conducted by organizations whose focus is mainly on homosexual advocacy (about 10%). The more trustworthy sources are those with no reason for bias. The American Psychological Association in 1989 estimated that 10% of men and 5% of women are gay. That's approximately 1 in every 15 people. This seems close to accurate.  If only 1% of Americans were gay, however, that would still be over 3 million people. And if 10% were gay, that would mean over 30 million.
Who are gay people? Gay people touch every segment of our population. They as varied and unique as are heterosexuals. Their one distinction is that they are attracted to like-gendered partners.
In my college days when I was trying to teach myself to play the guitar (a goal that’s not yet accomplished), the first song I taught myself to play was Come to the Water. Remember that one? “And Jesus said, Come to the Water, Stand by my side, I know you are thirsty, You won’t be denied. I felt every teardrop when in darkness you cried, and I strove to remind you that for those tears I died . . .” One of those campfire songs that spread quickly across the young Christian scene, much like “It only takes a spark to get a fire going . . .” Well, years later, churches were tearing this song out of their hymnals, and its popularity was squelched. Why? Because it was discovered that the writer, Marsha Stevens, was a gay woman. Never mind that she wrote music that inspired a generation of Christians, leading us to seek closer communion with God. She was quickly shunned by the Christian music industry.
Then there was gospel singer Kirk Talley who never even had a homosexual relationship, but still "fell from grace" after it was exposed that he confided in a friend his same-sex attractions. On Dec. 22, 2003, Kirk Talley, beloved Christian singer/songwriter ("Step Into the Water," "He Is Here," et.al.), Dove Award winner, Grammy nominee, the boyish-faced man dubbed "Mr. Gospel Music" found himself pleading to his friend to kill him, and to God to let him die. (GQ Magazine, August 2005)
In 2007 Evangelist Ted Haggard was exposed for a 3-year homosexual relationship. After three weeks of therapy, he claimed he was cured of years of homosexual struggle. He may have even believed it. (I believe in miracles, but have my doubts that this was one of them.) Then there was Rev. Gene Robinson of the Episcopal Church, New Jersey governor James McGreevey, and Christian recording artists Ray Boltz and Jennifer Knapp. The Christian community hears these stories and condemns. I hear these stories and see a culture that forces gay people to deny who they are, and the problems this inevitably brings.
WHAT IS THE GAY AGENDA?
To be treated like every other human being. Nothing more. The term "gay agenda" is one of many political watch words, meant to set off our emotions. Every person and every group has some kind of agenda. Evangelicals want to Christianize the world. Merchants want to make money. Gay people want to be respected and treated as the human beings they are.

WHY IS THE GAY POPULATION GROWING SO RAPIDLY?
It isn’t. The gay population, by all reputable evidence has remained fairly steady, percentagewise, throughout history. The recent difference is not that there are more gay people, but that, with the internet, cable TV, and especially social networking, more gay people are becoming comfortable enough to disclose their sexuality, and more are deciding to seek equal rights and recognition.
STUFF CHURCH PEOPLE LIKE TO SAY:
        1. Love the sinner, Hate the sin. This is probably the Church’s favorite response to the issue of homosexuality. It does have a nice ring to it, but it’s flawed on at least two levels. First, it assumes that homosexuality is a sin. And second, I have yet to see what that love for the sinner looks like. It is overshadowed by the hate for the sin. If we believe someone is living in abominable and repulsive sin, does he sense God’s love radiating from us? Imagine being told by someone that he loves you, but he hates your Christianity. Therefore you can be acceptable only if you don’t act upon it. Don’t attend church. Don’t tithe. Don’t share your faith. Ridiculous, isn’t it. How can a person separate himself from the person he is? Henri Nouwen said it this way: "Compassion can never coexist with judgment because judgment creates the distance, the distinction, which prevents us from being with the other." I challenge us to refrain from SAYING this overused platitude, and to pray instead that we will be filled with God’s love.

2. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. This one is so trivial on so many levels, but some find it catchy. Without giving it more attention that it merits, here’s my quick response: God created trees, so does that mean he didn’t create broccoli? If Adam had green eyes, would that mean that God didn’t create people with brown eyes? Were we to take the time to examine the Hebrew words from which Adam and Eve were translated, there would be more fodder for discussion, but I’ll move on . . .

3. The Bible says be fruitful and multiply. Again, I could write an entire blog responding to this one argument, but I won’t. We have amply populated the earth, too amply, many would argue. Allowing homosexuals their God-given human rights would not cause everyone else to stop populating. 
I just heard a minister argue this week that if gay people were allowed to marry, this would be the final generation of humanity, because there would be no procreation.  Really!?  If gay people were given the right to marry, would every heterosexual then decide to be gay?  Do we even think about these things we say?  Homosexuality is not a choice. A certain percentage of people are homosexual, despite what laws we may have for or against, and a much larger percentage of the population will continue to multiply, no matter how much we try to stop it. (Look at our teen pregnancy rates, etc.) The earth is already filled with unwanted and exploited children, in need of love and attention. And Jesus, by the way, was not a physical “multiplier,” just as Paul and many others in the NT were not.

4. If we don’t stop homosexuals, it will open the door for polygamy and bestiality. Polygamy and bestiality have no relation whatsoever to homosexuality. This has become one of the many political alarmist slogans, meant to appeal to uninformed peoples’ vulnerability. Polygamy and bestiality are behaviors, and behaviors are choices. This political agenda will continue to do all it can to convince everyone that sexual orientation is also a behavior and a choice. Studies have shown the more times we hear something, the more solidly we start to believe it, and the slogan repeaters are well aware of this. Studies have noted that bestiality practices are not uncommon among boys who grow up on a farm, but if true, (and "icky" if so) I have never heard of anyone desiring to marry his chicken, ever. And as for polygamy, based on Scripture alone, without consideration for our current cultural norms, it would be a stretch to condemn it, as polygamy was an acceptable part of Old Testament culture.

5. Gay people cannot be a part of God's family unless they repent and change. According to our Christian doctrines, we are all in need of repentance, but orientation is not a factor in that. Gay people do not need to repent of their orientation any more than heterosexual people need to repent of theirs. What we choose to do with our orientations, perhaps, but not for the orientation itself. Sexual orientation has no direct correlation with whether a person is or is not Christian. (Indirect, yes, because the churches have shunned the homosexuals.)

Nationally recognized organizations like Soulforce, Evangelicals Concerned, Gay Christian Network, and segments of many major denominations, are set up specifically to nurture and encourage Christian gay people. Every major denomination has begun struggling with this issue or will most probably have to do so soon. All the answers for the church are not easy, but may we at least reach the point of understanding that gay and Christian are not by nature antithetical. The most quoted verse of the Bible says WHOSOEVER believes will have eternal life. (John 3:16)
Homosexuals cannot be changed into heterosexuals. Despite what some Christians want so strongly to believe, an intelligent view of science and psychology is more and more conclusive that sexual orientation is not a choice. That causes serious problems for some of our Christian thinking, so we will argue the opposite position until we are red in the face, but ultimately, it doesn’t change the reality. There have been many entire books written on the question of why people are gay, and not being any kind of expert on that, I will completely skip over that chapter here, except to say that it is apparent that, whatever the reason, it has its roots early in life, far before the person begins to consciously think in terms of sexuality.  What toys do they prefer?  What clothes?  What playmates?

6. Protect the American family. Another political cliche. What does this really mean? Is the American family healthy without gay people? Would your marriage fall apart if gay people were given their rights? If we are truly concerned about the American family, why are we not wanting to put regulations on how easy it is to marry? Or to divorce? A quick glance into any public school classroom will give witness that the Leave It to Beaver family is not alive and well. Do you know what homosexuals are doing to fit into society? They are marrying your daughters, by the thousands. They love them and try their best to be good husbands, but they will inevitably hurt their “American family,” even if they never stray, because she will always know that something is not right, or wonder what’s wrong with her that she doesn’t please him.

The existence of gay people does not hurt "the American family." The Church's stand on homosexuality, however is causing tremendous damage! Not only to the homosexuals themselves who are repeatedly told by the Church that something is wrong with them and that need to repent of their "sinful lifestyle," (no, not directly, because most ministers and church people think there could never be a gay person there, not in their church), but also to the entire families and church families of these people. During the civil rights era of the 1960s, when African-Americans were being treated horrifically by the white majority, the only support a black child had was his/her black family and black church. The family and the Church nurtured the black child, protecting him/her as much as possible from the misguided culture that surrounded him/her. For the gay child, however, there is no support. It is the Church, and thus the family, that is most oppressive of all to his/her life. Not only does the Church oppress the gay person, but it teaches his family to oppress him. Parents are taught to be ashamed of their gay children, believing them to have "chosen a life of sin." With no support of church or family, gay young people seek acceptance, understanding and guidance from wherever they can find it, and are often unwelcome in their own families and churches "unless they change." If the "American family" is to be "protected," it may be the Church that needs repentance.

7. I don’t believe people are born gay. Without getting too deep into the age old argument of nature vs. environment, it is technically true that humans do not fully develop a sense of sexuality prior to puberty. However, it seems more and more apparent, that there is indeed a genetic factor involved, that some people are biologically predisposed to same sex attractions, and to deny this is to close our eyes to all evidence.  (See number 5 above.) Ignorance and closed minds are among Christianity’s worst enemies.
Herein is the crux of what divides us as Christians on this issue: Do homosexuals choose to be homosexual? Traditionalist Christians adamantly say yes, and if this were true, I would agree. Homosexuality would be a sin. If it is true, however, that homosexuality is genetically determined, much like eye color, tongue rolling, left-handedness, etc. (which is becoming more and more scientifically evident), then we are essentially saying that it is a sin for these people to be born. A homosexual person can no more deny his same-sex attractions than can a heterosexual deny his.  When did you choose to be attracted to the opposite sex?  And why would anyone CHOOSE a life of oppression, isolation, and rejection?

A century ago we were shouting that pianos in the church were of the devil. Then we shouted that abolition was of the devil. We shout that women in ministry is an outrage. And we quote Scripture to back up all our claims. Now, if the question is about homosexuality, our automated answer is “abomination.” Even Southern Baptist Seminary President Al Mohler blogged a couple of years ago of the likelihood that homosexuality is biological, quickly finding himself in the line of attack. One thing is for sure, either people are born gay or they are not, and that truth is not dependent on what we think about it.

8. Well, if they can’t change, they should just remain celibate. Some choose this path, just as do some heterosexuals, but history (and Scripture) has shown us that celibacy is not the overall answer. We are created as sexual beings, and that sexuality will likely come out perversely if not naturally, especially, I believe, in men, even if entered into with the sincerest of intentions. Consider, for example, the Catholic priesthood. And consider personally being told to live celibately. Not them. You.

9. If they repent and have enough faith, God will heal them. Again, the fallacy here is the assumption that orientation is a sin. The response of such evangelical leaders as Dr. James Dobson and Jerry Falwell has been to cure homosexuals. Dr. Dobson has advocated the use of so-called ex-gay ministries such as Exodus International. Prior to 2000 Dr. Dobson's Focus on the Family featured their own John Paulk, "the story of how one man overcame homosexuality." In 2000, however, when Paulk was spotted in a gay bar, he quickly disappeared from the organization family.

Interestingly, even the president of Exodus International agrees there is no "cure" for homosexuality. People do not choose their feelings, he says. They can only choose their behavior.  Thousands of testimonies attest to the harm done by these well-meaning "reparative" programs, and while there are also testimonies of "success," I have never heard any "success" testimony by someone who has been "cured" for as long as ten years.  All of us can change a behavior for a short time, especially if led emotionally to believe that God demands it.

What do you think, by the way, of the cultures that “cure” female sexuality by mutilating the genitals of the young girls? Why do we want to "cure" what needs no cure?

SO I’M SAYING THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A SIN?

Let’s look at a hypothetical scenario. We probably all choose to think of nuns as asexual beings, but that is not reasonable, as sexuality is a part of the human experience. Nuns, however, have chosen a life of celibacy, choosing not to act on their sexuality. But does that make them less heterosexual or homosexual? No, it doesn’t. If she is heterosexual but celibate, the church reveres her. If she is homosexual and celibate, do we call her a sinner? If so, we are wrong. If not, we must then realize a distinction between orientation and behavior. And if we cannot even fathom the concept of a homosexual celibate nun, we are disillusioned and are choosing to live in our own box, isolated from much of God’s Truth.
So, yes, I am saying that sexual orientation, whether homosexual or heterosexual, is not a sin. What is done with that orientation is indeed a choice and can certainly lead to sin, for both homosexual and heterosexual people. Promiscuity. Adultery. But not mere orientation.

SO IF HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A SIN, HOW SHOULD A GAY CHRISTIAN LIVE HIS LIFE?
How should a heterosexual Christian live his life? First and foremost devoted wholly to God, and second, actively loving and caring for others. Jesus said this is the greatest commandment. For all of us. Further, like a heterosexual person, a gay person should seek a committed monogamous relationship with a compatible Christian (unless he chooses celibacy), and should flee from all promiscuous or adulterous behavior.
And he said to him, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets." (Matt. 22:37)
WHY AM I WRITING THIS BLOG?
Homosexuality is the social justice issue of this generation, and I cannot keep from speaking out. The Church is wrong about this, clinging to traditional judgments that are increasingly incompatible with scientific truth, and incompatible, in my opinion, with Jesus’ life and ministry.
I blog because it breaks my heart to think of another generation of gay young people struggling alone without family or church support. Another generation of young people believing something is wrong with them and wasting years trying to change in order to fit in. Another generation of church outcasts, confused at why God must not love them and why He doesn’t answer their prayers to change them. I write because you might be his aunt. Or his teacher. Or his pastor. Or his parent. You might be her office mate. Or her neighbor. Or her child’s little league coach. For this reason I write, and I am not alone.
More and more individual Christians like Tony and Peggy Campolo, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Lutheran scholar Martin Marty, and Methodist minister Jimmy Creech, as well as mainline denominations like the United Church of Christ, the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Episcopalians, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America are beginning to step out and welcome everyone into their families.
A most interesting Focus on the Family story you may have missed was in 1997, when Focus on the Family co-founder Gil Alexander-Moegerle, having left the organization, wrote a letter of apology for the organization's stands on homosexuality and women's issues. (This story of course was not broadcast, and Dr. Dobson certainly did not endorse it.) He could no longer keep silent. In his words: "I apologize to lesbian and gay Americans who are demeaned and dehumanized on a regular basis by the false, irresponsible, and inflammatory rhetoric of James Dobson's anti-gay radio and print materials."
Christian organizations like Evangelicals Concerned, the Gay Christian Network, and Soulforce are offering love and support. Even some individual churches of the most closed denominations are stepping out to welcome all who want to join them. More and more Christians are hearing the cry of the marginalized and oppressed. More and more are choosing to practice God's love.

BUT THE BIBLE SAYS . . .
Leviticus clearly states if a man lies with a male as with a woman, they have committed an abomination. Likewise a few other passages make similar statements. How then, if I am a Christian, can I write such a blog as this?
Prayerfully and fully believing it is God who propels me.

Scripture alone will not lead the Church to a full understanding on this issue. If we are looking for a verse that says literally, "homosexuality is not a sin," we will not find it. On the contrary we will find the handful of verses that seem to say otherwise, at least on the surface. Nor would Scripture alone, let’s note, ever have led to the concept of monogamy or to the abolition of slavery. Slavery was an unquestioned part of the first century culture, as polygamy was in the Old Testament, and both would be much easier to justify through Scripture than to rebuke. A heart understanding, however, of Jesus' life and teachings, shows us the sin of oppression, the hurting people who have been personally wounded and oppressed. As true "Christians," we look into the eyes, we hear the voices, we feel the pain, we understand the heart cries of the wounded families and the isolated individuals, and we know in the depths of the soul that quoting Scripture is not enough. Nor was it for Jesus.
For those who strongly hold to a literalist understanding of the Bible (I don’t like the term inerrantist), this blog will be blasphemy. Your mind is set. May God bless you, and may we not be divided as brothers and sisters.
For the rest of you, if you are seeking God’s truth, not mine, not the Church’s, but God’s, I challenge you in three areas:
1. Pray. Pray for God’s wisdom and discernment. Pray that God alone will lead your mind and heart to whatever is true.

2. Read. Seek writings of Christians who think differently from you, and try to really understand their position, even if you will later choose to reject it. We never get a full picture of any issue when what we know about the other side is what those on our side tell us.

3. Listen. Seek out people who are gay, and invite them to tell you their stories. When they first knew they were gay, what kind of struggles they have experienced, if they chose to be gay, how it has shaped their view of God, etc. Do not talk to them about their sin. Just listen. This may be a difficult one, because they may not be willing to share their stories. If not, it is probably because they perceive us as judgmental and closed-minded. Maybe we are . . .

The apostle Paul clearly states that women should be quiet in church. How do we know this is not God’s mandate for our society? We pray for God’s wisdom and discernment. We read what women in ministry advocates have to say. And we seek out God-called women and invite them to tell us their stories. We witness the Spirit of God moving in and through their lives. How do we know slavery is not acceptable for our society? Likewise. Get to know people. People of all races, male and female, Republican and Democrat, Episcopalian and Southern Baptist. Heterosexual and Homosexual. Listen to them. Understand them. Embrace them as fellow human beings, created uniquely by God.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS


There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world. (Thomas Jefferson)
Truth is absolute. No one human being has all of it, but truth is not based on what we believe or on a democracy of belief. Truth is not even based on the Bible. On the contrary, it is the Bible that is based on Truth. Truth is. There is no incompatibility between Science and God. God is the Creator of all of nature and its laws. Thus nothing in nature is in itself incompatible with Him. Human scientists sometimes get things wrong. Human Christians sometimes get things wrong. But true science and its Creator are always perfect Truth. I see it as my challenge on this earth to responsibly seek Truth in all things, and to readily admit that there is much I will never know, especially on controversial issues that divide even God’s people. I certainly do not have all the answers on this issue. I write, not to divide, but to challenge, because there are millions of people in all our paths daily that Jesus has called us to love, not in word, but in heart. Sexual orientation alone is not a sin in the eyes of God. Of this I am most certain.
Neither a behavior nor a lifestyle, sexual orientation is a basic human instinct which can be denied for a time, but cannot and need not be “cured”. I blog to challenge our thinking, realizing at the same time that with issues such as this, most of us are so set in our opinions that no blog will penetrate our hearts. Forget this blog. Forget my words. But please open your heart on this subject, just enough to hear the occasional voices of the other side. Pray for your gay coworker daily (better yet, your gay son or brother), until you find yourself truly loving him, not flippantly, but compassionately. Then go for coffee, and invite him to tell you his story. Don’t tell him you don’t want him to go to hell. Don’t tell him you love him but hate his sin. Just be quiet and listen.
And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. (1 Cor. 13:2)
A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. (John 13:34)
He who believes in him is not condemned (John 3:18)
that whoever believes in him may have eternal life (John 3:15)

Sunday, March 25, 2012

B35. Confessions of a Southern White Woman

I am white.  My family is white.  My church is white.  Church?  Yeah, don’t leave that part out.   God is love.  Jesus loves the little children red and yellow black and white.   Been in church all my life, just like most of the white people in these stories.
Born in 1961 and raised in a one-stoplight town in rural NC, a town where annually in its town pride parade the town confederate flag lover who flies a flag in his front yard drives his flag down Main St. flaunting his "heritage."  And just 10-15 minutes away, yes today, 2012, there’s a very popular eating establishment open to whites only.  I didn’t choose the geography any more than I chose to be born white, but this is my Southern heritage.
I entered first grade just after the schools there were desegregated.  According to my first grade yearbook, there were 3 black children in my class of 25.  I don’t remember them well, except that one of them, I think it was Beverly*, was the best reader in the class, and I was amazed at how fast she could read “Run Spot run, See Spot run,” while the rest of us deliberately and painfully sounded out every word.
After that year, there were usually 1-2 black students in my classes, none one year, and they were often not the same ones, because the black students tended to be held back a lot.
I don’t remember thinking much about black people then.  I knew where they went to church, and we drove through one of their two neighborhoods on the way across the river to visit my grandparents.  At Christmas time we drove through there deliberately, because the Christmas lights were more colorful than white people’s.  N-word town was what that area was often called by white adults, as was often used the N-word in general, although "colored people" was the more acceptable and most often used term.  I don’t remember, though, sensing any guilt, or even hatred, from those who used the first one.  Condescension and entitlement yes, at least in retrospect.  There was just an unquestioned understanding that black people were inferior to whites.  It was understood that we should be polite to everyone but that they stayed in their neighborhoods and we in ours.
I remember once a year, at Thanksgiving, the four churches in town would meet together for a joint worship service.  This was the only time I remember as a child seeing black and white people together in church.  But what I remember most is my grandma hugging the black women, and the obvious friendship and love between them.  I am sorry I never asked her to tell me about her friendships with these women, but those hugs left a special imprint in my memory.
My fourth grade story is one I’ve never ever told, and I write it now with shame and tears.  It was recess, and we were playing freely on the outdoor basketball courts.  Some were shooting baskets.  Others were jumping rope or doing other things.  I wanted to play basketball, but Pam, a black classmate, who was much taller and more agile than the rest of us, always got her own rebounds and wasn’t sharing the ball with anyone else.  I confronted her, and she taunted back, escalating back and forth until I frustratedly called her the worst name I knew, yes that one.  She literally knocked the breath out of me, and someone went for the teacher.  Being white herself, the teacher refused to believe Pam’s story of what I had called her, and I kept quiet.  Pam was punished.
So was I, but only by the memory of it all, for the rest of my life.  That was the first and last time I would ever use that word.
My sophomore year in high school I started catching a ride back home from softball practice with a couple of black junior girls on the team.  I remember my daddy telling someone I had a “little black friend” and laughing at the cuteness of that thought.
Truth was though, that I had never really had a black friend, not in the sense of going home with each other or choosing to spend time together one-on-one, but the thought had never really occurred to me.
It was in college that I began to consciously question the race issue.  I remember one black girl in particular who lived on my hall.  I remember the inner conflict of noting her beauty, her intelligence, her poise and class, and cognitively computing for probably the first time that my accepted notions of black people were flawed.
My senior year my best friend Janelle was ¼ black, ¼ native American, ½ white.  She was light-skinned, but having never known her white father, she identified as black.   I don’t think her race had much impact on me, but my prejudices were changing.  By the time I graduated and got my first teaching job, my very few black students had a special place in my heart.
Later, I think it was 1990, while attending seminary, I experienced the most blatantly racist incident I hopefully will ever see.  A few of us students were attending a church in a nearby town, just outside Wake Forest NC, and we would often carpool.  On this particular Sunday I was driving, and my passengers were two white female students and Martin, a black male student.  Following the service I was the first one to the car, where I sat waiting for the others.  When they got to the car, Martin was horribly shaken, and they began to relate to me what had just transpired.  As Martin exited the church, a white man pulled him aside and pulled out a gun.  “There’s a church down the road for you, son.  Do you understand?”  As the story got out, the church split with half the church moving to a new location.  Martin didn’t go back.
More and more I was pondering race and its grip on our society.
A few years later, when I was teaching again, Aneeta and I became best friends.  Aneeta was black.  We shared each other’s homes including her delicious “soul food” cooking and her Louisiana jambalaya, and we shared each other’s deepest joys, pains and dreams.  It was through her that I came to understand the day to day racism with which the black community lives, not the news-making racism but the subtleties.  It was then that I could feel for myself the difference between how she and I were treated, and I could feel the judging glares on me when I would pick up her children from their sports practices or dance lessons.  And likewise, while her parents were always very kind to me, I was never allowed into their home because I was white.
During the past ten years I have become a strong advocate for all social justice.  I am a founding sponsor of the Martin Luther King Memorial in Washington DC and of the Smithsonian’s future Museum of African-American History.  My name is on the Wall of Tolerance at the Civil Rights Memorial Center in Montgomery, Alabama.  I have watched every documentary and movie I can find on American slavery and the Civil Rights era.  I have visited the International Civil Rights Museum and numerous slave landmarks.  I recently had the honor of preaching in an African-American church for Martin Luther King Day.
We all have the power to mold our own stories and those of future generations.  I’m proud when my mom picks up children of all races to take them to white-church Bible School.  I’m proud of my daddy’s personal friendship with one of the Greensboro lunch counter four.  I’m proud when my sister refuses with me to eat in the whites-only restaurant.  I’m proud of my niece and nephew whose friendships know no color.
Racism angers me, and it frustrates me that most white people don’t even see it.  A man in my former church had a joke for every moment, usually about black people.  A pastor in my hometown, likewise.  Both would tell you they are not racist, and I think they both believe it.  Many friends and relatives are afraid when they find themselves somewhere where they are the racial minority, and many others readily believe the most ridiculous stories about our own U.S. president because racial fears cloud their thinking.  A relative calls the whites-only restaurant his favorite place to eat.   Another shocked me with the affirmation that she was glad her family had moved because one of the children was hanging out too much with “coons.”   Another said people should be more careful who’s around when they say “things.”  My question is why do they ever need to say “things,” but I know the answer.  We say the “things” that are in our hearts, the “things” that reflect our own understanding or ignorance, and the “things” with which we think those around us will agree.
I tell my students though that there’s no shame in ignorance.  We do not choose our heritage, and ignorance just means we don’t know better.  But once our conscience has confronted us, we can no longer claim ignorance.  We choose who we will be.  God is love.  Red and yellow black and white, they are precious in his sight.  Do the pieces of my life fit together?
White people are not “my people.”  I am not defined by my skin color, although I have lived a privileged life because of it.  I am sorry that people who share my skin color have, throughout our nation’s history, treated other human beings as sub-human.  Mostly though I am sorry, deeply painfully and irreparably sorry, to Pam for that day on the fourth grade playground, when I was one of them.   

*Most names in this blog have been changed.


Related blog posts:

Friday, March 16, 2012

B34. I'm not Stupid, but I'm a Christian

Many of today’s Christian churches seem to have added a Vow of Stupid.  In order to be a member in good standing, one must sign in agreement to The Stupid Creed:

      1.  I reject science as in opposition to God.
      2.  A woman's purpose in life is to serve her husband.
      3.  God is the leader of my political party.
      4.  Gay people can choose to be straight.
      5.  Education makes people less spiritual.
Thankfully there are Christian churches that don't practice this Creed.  The word “Christian” means “follower of Christ.”  A follower of Christ is one who commits his/her life to the life and teachings of Jesus.  It takes little time and effort to read through the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and to see that there's little resemblance between the Christ of Christianity and the manifestations seen in some of our churches.
Christians, don’t adopt the creed!  It makes you stupid, and it has NOTHING to do with Jesus!
I am proud to call myself a Christian, the Jesus-focused kind.


Related posts: